Join the discussion!

(correction to my comment: There are times when I see one of my favorite conservatives as having contributed or posted an article on that site… & I cringe as if they’ve been tainted. I can only assume they’re just syndicating & posting everywhere possible.)

The site, wnd, is totally a fringe site. There are times when I see one of my favorite conservatives as having contributed or posted an article on that site. Basically, wnd is for people that wear tin foil hats, waiting for an attack from the mothership that must be orbiting the planet. Literally.
I wouldn’t be too concerned with O’Reilly or Victor Hanson speaking about black crime. What they are doing is countering Liberal dogma; & they over do it. They’re following a meme. O’Reilly is often troublesome & speaks to the middle of the Midwest & is often jeered at by intelligent conservatives. (He often promotes big govt & more laws & regulations)
Hanson’s comment about blacks. Surprises me. One always hates hearing an illogical concept from an admired source. Oh well, I still like his works. We can’t all be perfect. Frontpage Mag is often over the top & takes it cue from O’Reilly, often. I’ve heard many mainline, right conservatives who disagree with Horowitz.
The other issue is, Liberals are obsessed with race. Conservatives are not, (often, in this case, to their detriment, as being a little behind, in communications skills).
I understand exactly what your saying. Great blog!

Also, I don’t think the question here in the minds of most white Americans is, “are blacks more violent than whites?” I feel like most people are pretty well indoctrinated in the public school system to assume the best about people from other races.

I feel like the question has more to do with the current state of affairs and how we resolve these conflicts.

So a history lesson of all the bad things whites have ever done would be a moot point. We get that in public school too. We know already, and it neither justifies nor clarifies current events.

I don’t care for Tim Wise. I distrust his information. I therefore find it troubling that he is given as the only source for the statistics mentioned.

Did he take into account the number of blacks killed by whites who were simply defending themselves? It says nothing about the circumstances regarding the white on black murders.

I have actually read β€œWhite Girl Bleed a Lot” by Colin Flaherty. And from there I have always followed his articles from WND and even his website http://whitegirlbleedalot.com/. Colin Flaherty’s book and articles are heavily footnoted and referenced that will show people the truth and it was really undeniable.

That’s fine, believe the conclusions he draws from such material, as long as you are okay with me writing a book and filling it with the evidence of repeated genocide throughout European history and drawing conclusions from that.

Well, how far are we going back? Because, currently, we’re talking about the behavior of a group of people in one of the most advanced nations ever to grace the planet. There has never been a time when people, even and especially poor people, have had more. The context for killing is a little different. However, for the sake of argument, I’ll grant you your blind eye to time and context. I ask again, how far are we going back.? Because you might not enjoy the matching book on African barbarism to include genocide. Except, your genocides are both historical as well as much, much more recent than are ours. You may want to rethink the attack, “conservative”. Btw, I’ve never met a “conservative” who sincereyl quoted Tim Wise. There’s a first for everything.

I have been all over the world and spent time with people of many different races, and economic status. The 2 major reasons for violence always seem to end up being either religious or economic, rather than race. With that said, I am sure that there are always the exceptions to the rule. Men and Women should never be judged by anything but their very own actions